Stars, planets and galaxies

If I take the Earth as a particular case, the outer core of the Earth is liquid. It consists of liquid metal, an ally of iron and nickel, and it’s in a very complex state of motion. This is due to convection from the solid inner core, the slow solidification process that goes on at the boundary, and convection currents being strongly influenced by the rotation of the Earth – the Coriolis effect – in this liquid core.

This gives rise to whatever describes a form of helical turbulence. Turbulence with this property of helicity, which we now understand in dynamo theory, leads to a very famous effect known as the “alpha effect”. It’s a bootstrap effect whereby motion across the magnetic field gives rise to a current. This current, already understood by Faraday, gives rise to a magnetic field which can reinforce the magnetic field that you start from; so, in that sense, a bootstrap effect or a magnetic instability. That gives rise to the generation of the magnetic field of the Earth.

We’re very confident about that mechanism as the origin of the Earth’s magnetic field. Of course, we can’t go down to that deep core. All we have is measurements of the magnetic field here on the surface or further out into space, but we know how it evolves and how it changes with time.

When you go out to stars like the sun, the situation is very different, from a physical point of view. You’re dealing with an ionised gas and the convection zone of the sun – a very turbulent convection, but again, influenced by the rotation of the sun. So, there is the same Coriolis effect and the same generation of an alpha effect.

It’s more complicated, but on the other hand, we have much more detailed information about the solar magnetic field from satellite observations. We have a similar theory for the evolution of the solar magnetic field, which varies on a 22-year cycle. It’s periodic in time, unlike the Earth’s magnetic field, which is much more steady.

The galaxy is a self-gravitating system that is also rotating. There’s a strong degree of what we call “differential rotation” in the galaxy. Again, the same ingredients – rotation, fluid medium and a degree of convective motion – all interacting to provide what amounts to an alpha effect responsible, we believe, for the generation of the galactic magnetic field.

There is a constant interaction between theoreticians and observational astronomers in the context of black holes and galactic magnetic fields. I was involved with Donald Lynden-Bell in trying to explain the jets that are observed emanating from accretion disks, which leads to the formation of black holes. That is an area, again, where observation stimulates theory, and theoretical work analysis, usually of the equations of magnetohydrodynamics, stimulates renewed observation. It’s very much an interactive process.

We are very much on the border between mathematics and physics in this area, and physicists are equally involved, although we usually think of physics as being concerned with what goes on at the quantum level or in circumstances where quantum effects become important.

Fluid dynamics, on the other hand, is concerned with classical effects and other effects where the fluid is treated as a continuum. That turns out to have very wide practical applications in this astronomical context. It’s very much a to and fro interaction. In this case, the mathematicians and the observationalists really work side by side. Papers that are published in one area immediately stimulate activity in the other area. It’s very much a two-way process.